The two used methods for detecting amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease do not give unambiguous results, with the risk of incorrect or delayed care interventions. Now, researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden have found genetic explanations for the differences. The study is published in Molecular Psychiatry and may be important for more individual diagnostics and the development of future drugs.
Alzheimer’s disease is the most common dementia disease and leads to gradual memory loss and premature death. Approximately 120,000 people in Sweden have Alzheimer’s and there are approximately 50 million people worldwide. According to Hjärnfonden, the number will increase by 70 percent in 50 years, partly because people are living longer.
One of the earliest signs of Alzheimer’s is a pathological accumulation of amyloid protein forming insoluble deposits in the brain called plaques. This process can last for many years without appreciably affecting the person’s cognitive ability.
Amyloid plaques are present in the brain from an early stage of Alzheimer’s disease, already before mild cognitive impairment. At the same time, an early diagnosis is important for care interventions that could dampen the course of the disease.
Today, brain imaging of amyloid plaques with a PET camera and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid, CSF, from the spinal cord are the accepted methods for detecting pathological accumulations of amyloid.
But in up to 20 percent of cases, especially at early stages of the disease, the methods show different results. These differences can have implications for the patient for early diagnosis and treatment.
Now, researchers at Karolinska Institutet and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Milano have identified two alternative pathways for the development of amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease.
The results are based on PET imaging and CSF analyses in 867 participants, including patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s dementia and healthy controls. For two years, the amyloid accumulation in a subset of nearly 300 participants had been documented with both a PET camera and CSF analysis.
The results show that pathological changes in some individuals are first detected in the brain with a PET camera, and in other individuals first with CSF analysis. In the latter group, the researchers also saw a higher incidence of Alzheimer’s genetic risk factor and faster accumulation of amyloid plaques in the brain compared to the former group.
According to the researchers, the results reveal two different groups of patients, with different genetics and speed of amyloid plaque accumulation in the brain.
“The results may be important as amyloid biomarkers play a significant role as early diagnostic markers for clinical diagnosis. Today, CSF-analysis and PET are considered equivalent to determine the degree of amyloid accumulation, but the study indicates that the two methods should rather be seen as complementary to each other,” says first author Arianna Sala, currently a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Liège, Belgium and Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Source: Read Full Article